Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Daniel 11-Islam & Christianity

Tim Roosenberg is coming to speak at our church, so I decided to listen to his lectures before recommending the event. I really think he might be on to something! I was skeptical when I started listening to it, but give it a listen with an open mind.

Islam vs Christianity, The Coming Conflict
DANIEL 11 SEMINAR

by Pastor Tim Roosenberg



In this series Pastor Tim Roosenberg will share his much sought after understanding of Daniel 11. This is an abbreviated form of his 10 part Daniel 11 series "Islam and Christianity in Bible Prophecy." (Those who do not know the reformers Historicist method of prophetic interpretation may do better with the more basic 10 part series.) In this 3 part series Pastor Tim will show how much of the prophecy of Daniel 11 has already been fulfilled. In the second presentation Tim explains the 3 predicted conflicts between Islam and Christianity. He shows how two have already happened and the 3rd is gaining in intensity. During the 3rd presentation Tim explains why he does not believe atheistic communism is the final King of the South, and why E. G. White had so little to say on Daniel 11.

If you are not very familiar with Bible prophecy, you might want to listen to this one first... 


In this 10-part series Tim will help you understand a remarkable prophecy in Daniel 11 and 12.  This prophecy starts in Daniel’s time and chronologically unfolds through the time of Christ, extending through our time and on to the end of the millennium.  This prophecy includes a future, major conflict between Islam and Christianity.  Don’t miss this opportunity of a lifetime to understand Bible prophecy and current events more clearly than ever before and face the future with confidence and peace.


Pastor Roosenberg's other site is Islam vs Christianity 

You can watch all the same videos on that site as the Sealing Time Ministries site. VIDEOS HERE

Here is the documentary that he mentions. I really enjoyed it. 

2 comments:

  1. [Thanks, Grace. Spied the following on the net.]

    Futurism Was, Is, and Is To Come

    Preterists claim that the "Antichrist" and the "great tribulation" were fulfilled during the 70 AD period.
    If so, why do we find that the arrival of the Antichrist was regarded as a future event by writers who lived during and after 70 AD?
    Polycarp (70-167) wrote that "He comes as the Judge of the living and the dead."
    Justin Martyr (100-168) said that "[Antichrist] shall venture to do unlawful deeds on the earth against us the Christians...."
    Irenaeus (140-202) wrote that the ten kings (Rev. 17)"shall give their kingdom to the beast, and put the church to flight."
    It's not true that Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) "revived" futurism because it was never lost during the Middle Ages or prior to that period of time.
    Bernard of Clairvaux (1090-1153) stated: "There remains only one thing - that the demon of noonday [Antichrist] should appear."
    Roger Bacon (1214-1274) spoke of "future perils [for the Church] in the times of Antichrist...."
    John Wycliffe (1320-1384) referred to "the hour of temptation, which is coming upon all the world, Rev. iii."
    Martin Luther (1483-1546): "[The book of Revelation] is intended as a revelation of things that are to happen in the future...."
    (Google or Yahoo "Famous Rapture Watchers" to see quotes from many Christian leaders throughout the Church Age which prove that they expected a future Antichrist and a future great tribulation.)
    Preterists use Matt. 24:34 ("This generation will not pass....") to try to prove a 70 AD fulfillment of "Antichrist." Since many of them see "these" (Matt. 25:46) fulfilled in the future in Rev. 20, why can't they apply futurism as easily to Matt. 24:34? After all, the word "this" is the singular form of "these"!
    To see something that preterists, historicists, and futurists can all agree on, Google "Pretrib Rapture Secrets."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rocky, thanks for your comments, and I hope you have found this series useful! I'll check out those suggestions.

    Also, I recently learned that in Matt 24:34, Jesus was giving a dual prophecy about the destruction of Jerusalem and the end times. That's why he made the remark about the generation not passing away. He meant that the generation would not pass away until they saw their city destroyed. That made sense to me.

    ReplyDelete